Title: The Catcher
In The Rye
Author: D.
J. Salinger
Publisher:
Little, Brown and Company
Publish
date: 1951
ISBN: 9782253009788
Book quote:
“Anyway, I keep
picturing all these little kids playing some game in this big field of rye and
all. Thousands of little kids, and nobody's around - nobody big, I mean -
except me. And I'm standing on the edge of some crazy cliff. What I have to do,
I have to catch everybody if they start to go over the cliff - I mean if
they're running and they don't look where they're going I have to come out from
somewhere and catch them. That's all I do all day. I'd just be the catcher in
the rye and all. I know it's crazy, but that's the only thing I'd really like
to be.”
I re-read this recently after a gap of three
decades or so, and a prompting from comments to the effect of What is the point of this book, why would I
want to read about some crappy dude who’s hopeless at everything and screws up
his life in every possible way? To be fair, my only recollection of the
novel from last reading was a vague sensation of annoyance.
For starters, what comes out of Holden’s mouth
and transpires in action is certainly crappy, but there’s no doubt we’re meant to have empathy for him – precisely because of his empathy for others. It’s this,
and the inability to bear the monstrous injustice he starts to be aware of as
he grows out of the viewfinder of childhood, that makes him turn away from the
painful sight and start poking his finger in his eye or whatever moronic
consequential action he decides on next. He can’t stand to see a stranger
snubbed in the street, or a roommate he doesn’t like being excluded (even it’s
for precisely the same reasons he dislikes them for). Certainly not even entertain
the idea of a young girl whom he likes being treated in a way that – well, in a
way that boys tend to treat girls. The moral struggle and culpability of not
being able to right all (or any) of the wrongs in the world is an ongoing issue
for any human with a conscience. The post-war environment of the early 1950s
and the state of being an adolescent serve here as nexus for this anxiety to
coalesce against. It’s not, however, a unique situation.
Critics sometimes cite the ‘shocking’
vocabulary as a milestone in literary freedom of expression. The only shocking
thing about the vocabulary is the head-bangingly monotonous repetition. Whether
Salinger set out to gain profanity-notoriety-points or whether he was merely
using the inarticulacy as a show-not-tell for the powerlessness of Holden’s
emotional state is a moot point. For sure, something written this
self-indulgently and carelessly would never see past the inside of a garbage
bin in an editor’s office these days. If writers today wanted to gain the same
effect we’d have to use a whole heap of other tactics to keep the reader
interested and validate the page count. The flat-footedness is accentuated in
portions where other narrators come in. Strangely, they all have similar diction
– minus some profanity, perhaps. It’s probably because of the shock-value that
the volume ever got published. Moral mores are some of the hardest obstacles to
transcend and often they’re so ingrained we don’t even know they’re restraining
us. So I guess good on you Salinger. Does that make it a classic though? No, I
don’t think so. It makes it a historical piece, worthy of note. To hold it up
as a valid literary example to generations of today is erroneous.
It’s only towards the end that we’re told of the
event that started Holden on his downwards spiral: the suicide of a boy in the
first school he was expelled from. The boy jumps to his death one night having
borrowed Holden’s polo neck jumper. The jumper and not knowing why he’d wanted
to borrow it connect Holden indecipherably and unstatedly to culpability for
the death. The still relatively new field of psychology that Salinger explores
through this plot and structure is clumsy by today’s standards but as an early
conscious assay in literature it probably has a laudable place. Not one we need
to linger at.
In short, yes, there is a point to Catcher In The Rye. It says, take time
to bear with obnoxious moody teenagers (and people in general) because they
might well be trying their best to reconcile themselves to an insane world
full of cruelty, and figuring out how to respond. Today, we’d try to say this
on a budget of about 1,500 words max. If you wanted longer, you’d have to make
it a damned sight more interesting.
Two Moose Hoofs up out of five – both for
historical value.
No comments:
Post a Comment